BERLIN — The French say they need the largest condoms in Europe while Greeks get by on smaller ones, according to a Europe-wide study by a German consultancy that provides advice on condoms.
The study by the Singen-based Institute of Condom Consultancy was done by asking 10,500 men in 25 countries to measure their penis and enter the number into a database.
The results show Frenchmen on average claim to need 15.48 centimeters (6.09 inches) long condoms, about 3 centimeters longer than Greeks, whose condom size requirement was the most modest.
Jan Vinzenz Krause, the Institute's director, told Reuters on Friday the data was collected over a period of eight months.
He did not want to comment on how honest he thought the Frenchmen had been in reporting the data.
The survey was aimed at educating youngsters about the importance of effective contraception.
The institute also offers online condom-size advice and hosts "Pimp Your Condom" — an annual fair organized in cooperation with the national AIDS Trust — with the aim of educating teens about sexually transmitted diseases.
The study by the Singen-based Institute of Condom Consultancy was done by asking 10,500 men in 25 countries to measure their penis and enter the number into a database.
The results show Frenchmen on average claim to need 15.48 centimeters (6.09 inches) long condoms, about 3 centimeters longer than Greeks, whose condom size requirement was the most modest.
Jan Vinzenz Krause, the Institute's director, told Reuters on Friday the data was collected over a period of eight months.
He did not want to comment on how honest he thought the Frenchmen had been in reporting the data.
The survey was aimed at educating youngsters about the importance of effective contraception.
The institute also offers online condom-size advice and hosts "Pimp Your Condom" — an annual fair organized in cooperation with the national AIDS Trust — with the aim of educating teens about sexually transmitted diseases.
HISTORY OF FRANCE
Gallic Wars - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when NOT led by a Frenchman."
Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars -- when fighting Italians.
Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots.
Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flower pots as chapeaux.
The Dutch War - Tied.
War of the Augsburg League / King William's War / French and Indian War -Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.
War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved ever since.
American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."
French Revolution - Won, primarily due to the fact that the opponent was also French.
The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.
War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu.
Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
War Against Greenpeace - Lost. 1985, the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior prepares to sail for Moruroa Atoll for a major campaign against French nuclear testing. Agents of the DGSE [secret service] bomb and sink the ship in Auckland Harbor. I tree-hugger sans tree drowns. Six weeks later agents Prieur and Mafart plead guilty to charges of manslaughter and willful damage. They get sentences of 10 years and 7 years. French Prime Minister Fabius admits to state terrorism on TV.
War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.
Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last by female schizophrenic who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when NOT led by a Frenchman."
Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars -- when fighting Italians.
Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots.
Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flower pots as chapeaux.
The Dutch War - Tied.
War of the Augsburg League / King William's War / French and Indian War -Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.
War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved ever since.
American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."
French Revolution - Won, primarily due to the fact that the opponent was also French.
The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany first plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States. Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." Sadly, widespread use of condoms by American forces forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.
War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu.
Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
War Against Greenpeace - Lost. 1985, the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior prepares to sail for Moruroa Atoll for a major campaign against French nuclear testing. Agents of the DGSE [secret service] bomb and sink the ship in Auckland Harbor. I tree-hugger sans tree drowns. Six weeks later agents Prieur and Mafart plead guilty to charges of manslaughter and willful damage. They get sentences of 10 years and 7 years. French Prime Minister Fabius admits to state terrorism on TV.
War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.
A joke I heard recently:
Q: Why did the new French navy buy glass bottom boats?
A: So they can see the OLD French navy...
137 comments:
Hope you guys had a great Thanksgiving!.
I thought maybe a little levity might be in order...
Why Obama won't talk to FOX news:
“I am convinced that if there were no Fox News, I might be two or three points higher in the polls. If I were watching Fox News, I wouldn’t vote for me, right?
“Because the way I’m portrayed 24/7 is as a freak! I am the latte-sipping, New York Times-reading, Volvo-driving, no-gun-owning, effete, politically correct, arrogant liberal. Who wants somebody like that?”
He might have a point.
I don't think he drives a Volvo...
Shit!!!! I drive a Volvo....does that make me a......oh no say it is'nt so.
Hey Rusty,
You might enjoy this...
Looks like our buddy KayInsane has made some new friends, LOL.
You have to scroll down for the comment section for posts by "RadicalRedneck", and replies to his posts.
Klink is always refering to Kay and her blog.
In my opinion neither of their elevators reach the top floor.
Do people like her just dream that crap up? To me its scary to think an idiot like her is running loose or perhaps she just says idiotic things to stir the pot,either way she's just a nitwit.
Greetings, gents. I just wanted you to know that that 1138 lunatic is trolling around again. And, I'm telling you, this guy makes Clif seem like a kindly fellow. I can't believe the stuff I just had to delete.
Thats the bondage guy,is'nt it?
I think he's a friend of Mike and Klinks.
I think Mch (who's actually not a bad fellow - I think Voltron E-mails him) is the bondage guy. 1138 is the "other" angry veteran. I think you guys mixed it up with him over at my site. A real piece of work.
Actually Will,
MCH emailed me twice.
Both times after one of Barts particularly viscious diatribes.
He thought Lydia might be on his side and I tried very hard to convey to him that Lydia is every bit as devious and evil as the rest of them but I don't think he believed me.
I never knew about the bondage stuff until Bart went off about it...LOL
Another one of those guilt by association things Will...LOL
Lydia either agrees with them or is amused by them or both. It's her board, if she were offended by their words or actions she'd ban them, and she doesn't.
And you missed the early days when Bart wanted to control her blog. He hacked her site and others computers who were trying to access it, causing much chaos until she gave him control of security. After that it all settled down.
In the meantime though FF and I and Rusty and others were accused of all the problems they were having. Lydia made some slanderous and malicious statements about us even though we had nothing to do with it.
She tries to wrap it all up in niceness, but she's just as evil as they are.
She claimed once that I was hosting malicious software on my site here.
But several times after visiting HER site I ran virus scans and found keyloggers and various other spyware on my computer.
They have deleted posts of mine and made it look like I did it, (post removed by author...etc) when I did not. Cliffy is very good at posting under someone else's alias too.
It's pretty simple actually. They accuse you of doing something you're not, so then they claim they're justified in doing it back to you.
Just keep watching. If they accuse you of something, it just means their already doing it.
Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
Mike, amongst your list of Bush villains was Bob Gates. Well, it appears that your hero doesn't necessarily agree with you. He might be keeping him on, actually. And HILLARY!! as Secretary of Defense? Where's the "change", bro?
P.S. How 'bout the Mikester, though? He shoots his wad on Bob Gates, only to learn that Obama just might keep Bob Gates. It really must suck to be Mike sometimes."
No it ACTUALLY must suck to be an illiterate lying Reich Wing troll with ADHD and a reading comprehension problem because I said NOTHING of the sort I actually defended Gates and stated why the pick made sense...........While i'm no huge fan of Gates I said i'm ok with the pick and why it made sense........
Heres what I ACTUALLY said"
Mike said "Personally I have no problem with Hillary as Sec of state or Gates staying on as Sec of Def...............I think they both have the potential to to a great job and clean up Bush and his Neo Con cronnies foreign policy disasters.
Never envisioned myself defending Gates..........but seriously its the Sec of Defenses job to carry out the will of the president and insure the mission he is given is successful and Gates resisted the idiocy of the Neo Cons as much as he could, he was a breath of fresh air after Rummy..........With Admiral Fallon run out by Bush's Neo Con war mongers Gates was pretty much ALL that stood between the Neo Cons attacking Iran and startting WW3.............Gates released NIE's and other intelligence reports that seriously undermined the credibility and ability of the Neo Cons to attack Iran...........if Gates had been any more defiant or under cut the NEo Con agenda any more he would have been fired and replaced with a blindly loyal Neo Con lacky and we would have had WW3.
Bart I dont think your seeing WHY Obama would keep Gates...........its like a chess master thinking endgame at the beginning of the game...........Obama is thinking 2012 NOW............IF we keep Bush's Defense Sec and give him a new mission and Iraq gets fixed then its CLEAR to ALL iraq was a failure of Bush/Neo Con leadership and incompetence and the Neo Cons will not be able to claim the Demacrats surrendered in Iraq.........are they going to say Bush's defense surrendered??
He's marginalizing the Neo Con loons and giving Hilllary and Gates a chance to redeem themselves..........and lets not forget its their JOBS to carry out the Will of the President if they dont follow Obama's agenda and lead they can be fired.
Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
Mike, amongst your list of Bush villains was Bob Gates. Well, it appears that your hero doesn't necessarily agree with you. He might be keeping him on, actually. And HILLARY!! as Secretary of Defense? Where's the "change", bro?
P.S. How 'bout the Mikester, though? He shoots his wad on Bob Gates, only to learn that Obama just might keep Bob Gates. It really must suck to be Mike sometimes."
So not only is Bill O'lielly lying AS USUAL that I CLAIMED Gates was a "BUSH VILLAIN" but also that i had a problem with him staying on..............not only did I clearly state Gates is NOT a Neo Con but I clearly defended him and said I am ok with Obama retaining him.............let me just clarify that I am no huge fan of Gates and I would also be ok with him being replaced but Gates is not A Neo Con, i'm ok with him staying on and he is far from the devil in fact Gates was clearly the voice of reason after Admiral Fallon was run out of the military compared to Rummy, GWB and Cheney he was a breath of fresh air that quite possibly helped prevent WW3!
Will Are you:
A) a lying sack of shit troll
B) A Fucking Retard
C) An illiterate suffering from ADHD with a severe reading comprehension problem
d) All of the above
I would say all of the above you IDIOT!
Tell some more bald faced lies you ignorant little troll!
Voltron said...
Another one of those guilt by association things Will...LOL
Lydia either agrees with them or is amused by them or both. It's her board, if she were offended by their words or actions she'd ban them, and she doesn't.
And you missed the early days when Bart wanted to control her blog. He hacked her site and others computers who were trying to access it, causing much chaos until she gave him control of security. After that it all settled down.
In the meantime though FF and I and Rusty and others were accused of all the problems they were having. Lydia made some slanderous and malicious statements about us even though we had nothing to do with it."
You clowns LOVE to rewriye history dont you........you guys are a damn joke!
Why Mike,are you cross?
Run back to LC....little Mike.
Run back to where your chums think you actually know something.
Perhaps worf will log on and you two can continue your economic summit.
Two twits who could'nt rub two nickels together curing the countrys economic woes.
thereturnofRusty said...
Poor Mike has been trying to establish a positive legacy for Carter the past two years.
Instead of trying to rewrite history Mike shold try cracking open a history book once in a while.
Its gererally accepted that Carter was one of, if not the worst president of the 20th century.
The past years spike in fuel prices was nothing compared to people waiting in line for hours to get three gallons on gasoline during Carters years.
Not to mention 12% unemployment and interest rates as high as 21%
limiting home buying to almost zero.
I could mention the americans held hostage for over 400 days in Iran while Carter sat around with his thumb up his ass afraid to do anything.
Yea,old Jimmy was one hell of a president.Its easy to shut Mike up when he goes into his pro Carter rant...just ask him if Carter was in fact that good why on earth did the american people throw him out of office after one term in the second largest landslide defeat in the 20th century."
Its you gutless trolls that yry to rewrite history...............here allow me to correct your ignorance Crusty!
1) First of all little Troll Unemployment was NOWHERE NEAR 12% under Carter and Interest rates were NOWHERE Near 21% under Carter and Housing wasnt dead yet either the truth is Carter appointed Paul Volker and starting raising interest rates and that coupled with the treasonous Iran Contra scam the treasonous Repug/Neo Con assholes pulled probably cost him relection......interest but unemployment reached a high of about 11% under Ronald Reagan in 1983 and intersst rates Also topped 20% under Reagan not Carter little troll!
2) As for the hostages what was The Reich Wing doing during the hostage crisis..........oh yeah committing treason selling weapons to the enemy to steal the presidency then pardoning all the treasonous bastards kinda like that treasonous war criminal GWB will do soon.
3)As for the reason Carter Didnt win........he dint selfishly politicize EVERYTHING and think short term for short term self serving political gain like the treasonous greedy Reich Wing does.............he urged sacrifice, conservation and actually made hard decisions like appointing Volker to raise interest rates to induce a recession to break the back of inflation before an election............Carter also diversified our country away from its dependency on foreign oil by increasing fuel economy standards in automobiles, building solar, wind, nuclear, coal, Natural gas power plants that enabled inflation to be contained and allowed the economic prosperity we enjoyed for over 20 years under Reagan and Clinton...........without Carters longterm thinking and personal sacrifice regarding greater energy independence and in allowing Volker to raise interest rates to fight inflation we would have never enjoyed the economic prosperity of the 80's and 90's!
But its funny how an ignorant asshole who's been DEAD WRONG about essentially EVERYTHING still has the hubris to run his damn mouth.
Hey Crust werent you the retard that proclaimed interest rates were at 40 year lows in 2007 after they had gone up over 500% from 1% to 5 1/4%...........LOL no one ever accused you of being a genius Crusty........but that makes you the DUMBEST MF on the planet...........you might even have Ole Doggy Feith beat as dumb as dirt asshole!
Mike,you're such a moron.You cant post your opinions about a fool like Jimmy Carter and expect people to even consider them as facts.
Intrest rates for a 30 year fixed mortgage during pinhead Jimmys ONE term did hit 21%.
Yes there were gas lines during dipshit Carters term.
Yes,unemployment rate did hit 12% during the wimp Carters ONE term.
Yes,americans were held hostage for over 400 days in Iran because Jimmy was indeed a wuss.
You cant rewrite that one you dizzy fat bastard.
Now run back to your chums.
No one here has any respect for you.
We know you're an idiot.
thereturnofRusty said...
Mike,you're such a moron.You cant post your opinions about a fool like Jimmy Carter and expect people to even consider them as facts.
Intrest rates for a 30 year fixed mortgage during pinhead Jimmys ONE term did hit 21%.
Yes,unemployment rate did hit 12% during the wimp Carters ONE term."
BS you Fucking TROLL BACK These lies up with facts or STFU..........those are bald faced lies and you KNOW IT..............Unemployment NEVER hit 12% under Carter EVER and the highest Interest rates were under Ronald Reagan.................unlike your delusional Reich Wing Revisions of History FACTS are easily verifiable and cn be proven.
And what you just said is total BS being spewed by an ignorant troll.
How about this you gutless pussy if your SO SURE unemployment was 12% during the Carter Presidency and Interest rates peaked during Carter's Presidency how about you bet your life on it.............hows that you gutless pussy.
Carter got tossed out in the second biggest landslide in the 20th century because......according to deluded Mike "he did'nt politicize everything."
No deluded Mike....he got tossed out because he was an incompetent,weak,confused excuse for a president....thats why he got booted out on his ass.
And if your too Damn chickenshit to man up and do that how about if you lose you man up and get your pussy ass in a UFC cage with me so we can see if your man enough to run your big fat troll mouth then.................how about if YOUR right I pay for the gym and if i'm right (which is a given ) you pay for it!
And if your TOO damn utless for that how about we wager $30,000 just like I offered you on the election you Pussy!
You cant change mustard to custard.....Carter was the biggest failure in the 20th century.
Just accept that fact and stop making an ass out of yourself.
You just look real dumb when you do this stupid shit.
Come on you Fucking Pussy I offered you 3 wagers..............surely a "big tough" Reich Wing asshole like you isnt too much of a pussy to at least accept one of them?
30,000....Mike thats over a years salary for you.
Mike,can you fit in a UFC cage?
Thats not the issue Pussy Boy.............the issue is if unemplyment was EVER 12% under the Carter Presidency like YOU CLAIMED>
Come on you gutless pussy back up you Reich Wing BS or run away like the gutless little puss you are!
Watch out Mike....I may be even tougher then that comedian in Vegas that made you pee your pants.
You said unemployment was 12% during the Carter presidency...................Back up your Reich wing BS!
Go disprove what I've said....or forever be considered an idiot.
Now go,I've given you a job to do.
Hurry up and report back to us.
The all powerful Rusty has given you a project.
Put your paper hat on and get to work.
Take off the tin foil hat first.
I just checked the unemployment rate never topped 7.8% during Carters presidency you stupid troll!...................keeo flapping your mouth spewing your lies and Reich Wing BS Crusty!
Funny though the highest unemployment in the last 60 years occured under Ronald Reagan!
Another opinion from the deluded one.....well that makes it fact.
What about the comedian thing....is that a fact or opinion?
Or you dressed as a Klingon at the Star Trek convention.
Everyone here knows exactly what you are Mike.....a chubby,little fool without a semblance of a life.
Your LC crap does'nt fly here.
Now BOO!!!! Run back to worf,Klink,Artful Dodger and the gang.
Here little troll heres the link its a FACT that unemployment didnt go over 7.8% under Carter and reached a 60 year peak under Reagan
http://www.miseryindex.us/urbymonth.asp
Fuck you pussy boy I;ll leave when i'm good and ready.............you and that sack of shit Will arent man enough to make me do a damn thing!
You little Reich Wing losers ALWAYS run when a fact gets posted.............facts to you imbeciles is like sunlight or holywater to a vampire.
Run little Troll Run............its a fact!
BTW Hope you had a good Thanksgiving Voltron!
Mike,what about the comedian....you never did say anything about that.
Or the Klingon outfit.
Must piss you off that you cant cry to "fair implanted Lydia' here.
"Lydia,delete Rusty,he's making fun of me again...please delete him Lydia,hes making me cry."
Will is a sack of shit?
Now you run in the bathroom and wash your mouth out with soap.
Must piss you off that you have to hide behind your keyboard like a gutless little punk spewing lies and baby talk personal attacks when ever a fact comes up to make you look like the ignorabt little man you truly are!
What about 12% unemployment under Carter?
What about 40 year all time low interest rates in 2006-2007 when they had risen 500% from 1% to 5 1/4%
What about those dumb as dirt Reich Wing lies and revisions of history?
What about you being too big a gutless pussy to wager $30,000 or get in the UFC ring with me...............come on punk if your SO sure that Unemployment was 12% under Carter put your money or your big fat ass where your mouth is?
thereturnofRusty said...
Will is a sack of shit?"
Well you would know better than me since your our resident EXPERT on sacks of shit............Why I hear you even have a BS in BS and a doctorate in crapology!
thereturnofRusty said...
Shit!!!! I drive a Volvo....does that make me a......oh no say it is'nt so."
Pussy!!!!!!!!!!
I'll tell you what twinkle toes,I'll take a bet from you on the De La Hoya,Pacquiano fight.
Or the Penn State,USC Rosebowl.
Or how far the Zags will get in the NCAA's
Or who wins the Big 12.
Take your pick.
Remember.....always bet with your head,not over it.
Or we could play heads up poker.
Your pick sweetie.
Several weeks ago, Mike, you made a list of all the evil villains in the Bush administration. Among those names you listed was Gates. THAT was what I was referring to, you lunatic. Yes, unemployment was "only" 7-8% under Jimmy Carter. But interest rates were pushing 20% and inflation was double-digit. George W. Bush was a bad president, yes, but so, too, was Jimmy Carter. A decent man but a joke as a president. As for You, Mike, you're bonkers - flat out, bro.
You say you're not partisan, Mike. But, man, only a bald-faced partisan would even attempt to resurrect the Carter legacy at this point. I mean I remember those gas lines, man. P.S. No, it wasn't ALL his fault. But, I'm telling you, he was weak. I voted for Anderson, by the way.
Hey Jackass..................Carter DIDNT think or act like a partisan and THATS WHY he didnt get relected................he allowed Volker to RAISE interest rates to induce a recession to fight inflation and he urged Americans to sacrifice rather than doling out $600 checks to squabder a surpuls and telling people its "patriotic" to blow it at the mall...........Carter was the LAST President in over 30 years to mandate increased fuel economy and to strongly push alternative energiy like Wind, Solar, Coal, Nat Gas Nuclear etc.......to diversify us away from imported oil from countries that hate us.
Carter thought for the long term good of the country rather than as a self serving partisan doing what was best to get himself relected...........his raising interest rates prior to an election and energy initiatives are what gave us 20 years of prosperity and reasonsable inflation.
If Volker wouldnt have raised interest rates and the Reich Wing wouldnt have committed treason with Iran Contra Carter would have been relected.
thats not partisan thats just the facts...............Crusty's lies about 12% unemployment under Carter are partisan BS!
Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
Several weeks ago, Mike, you made a list of all the evil villains in the Bush administration. Among those names you listed was Gates."
BS............I just finish defending Gates not even 3 days ago and you Lie and say i'm Villifying him and Claim i'm calling him a Neo Con....................the people I wanted and still want gone are Bush, Cheney, Paulson, Bernanke, Mukasey, Martin, and several Cox and several other cronnies that NEED to be purged!
I NEVER had a problem with Gates,............i'm not a huge fan or cheerleader but I NEVER CLAIMED he was a cronny or a NEO CON!
I'm guessing Mike lives in one of those "habitat" houses....thus his admiration for one of the worst presidents in americas history.
Wow....I was wrong,unemployment was "only" bouncing off 8% during Carters failed term.
Its a shade over 6% now and the loons say the sky is falling.
I do agree with Mike that the conservatives were responsible for Carters dismal re-election bid.
Its a bit quizical Mike never trys to justify the peanut farmer allowing Iran to hold americans hostage for more then a year.Maybe that also was the Reich Wings fault.Maybe the Reich Wing caused Carter to hide under his desk....yea,thats gotta be it...it could'nt be because Carter was a eunuch.
Yea,old Jimmy said "turn the heat down in your house." How inspiring.What a guy.
Mike,you really make yourself look stupid when you try to paint Carter as a success.
People would have a modicum of respect for you if you'd just once say you were wrong instead of talking out your ass.
We'll see what unemployment goes to from the Bush Recession.............my guess is 9%-12%
Go back a week or two, Mike. You made a laundry-list of Bush's cronies and, yes, Gates was one of them you listed. And that's why I started laughing when I heard that Obama was keeping Mr. Gates.
Damn,the Vikes are kicking the crap out of the Bears.
wasnt unemployment like 3.9% when Bill Clinton was in office.......now its around 7%.............Heckuva job Georgie..................oh yeah wasnt there ALSO a surplus under Clinton instead of the BIGGEST deficit in recorded history.
You have NOTHING to be smug about little troll!
Look at Mike here. He's proactively blaming Bush for any possible increase in the unemployment rates under Obama. Very shrewd, me-bucko!
Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
Go back a week or two, Mike. You made a laundry-list of Bush's cronies and, yes, Gates was one of them you listed. And that's why I started laughing when I heard that Obama was keeping Mr. Gates."
Prove it!
Mike,when did you become convinced Will and I are Bush supporters?
You're way off base there sparky.
I voted for Barr and I think Will said he voted for Obama.
Will "take no prisoners" Hart said...
Look at Mike here. He's proactively blaming Bush for any possible increase in the unemployment rates under Obama. Very shrewd, me-bucko!"
Hey Jackass first of all Bush is STILL our President for another 2 months UNFORTUNATELY.............second of all all the pathetic trolls you associate with called the 2001 recession the CLINTON Recession even thouggh it clearly happened under GWB..................this one CLEARLY happened under GWB's watch there no ambiguity there whatsoever.
Sure a reasonable unbiased non partisan straight shooter like your self would WANT to acknowledge THAT right WILL?
Look, Mike, this is not hard science. We're dealing with correlations here. If a person wanted to, they could connect any number of dots (Clif, for instance, still blames Nixon for the Bay of Pigs) they wanted to. But for better or worse, presidents are judged mostly by what happens during THEIR watch. It may not be totally fair and all, mind you. But that's just the way it is. Bush can't blame Clinton and Obama can't blame Bush.
I personnally hope Obama is a rousing success.I hope the Dow goes up to 20,000 on his watch,I hope interest rates stay low,I hope no one attacks us and I hope he gives ice cream to everyone.
Bush wasnt running jackass..........unless your NOW admitting McSame was Bush 3?
O.K., I'll go back 2 weeks and look for it.
The economic implosion HAPPENED on Bush's watch BOTH OF THEM!
He CANT Blame Clinton because It DIDNT HAPPEN on Clintons Presidency.........and he Cant Blame Obama Because he's NOT EVEN PRESIDENT YET STOOPID!
You IDIOTS LOve to rewrite History the 2001 Recession wasnt Clintons it happened on Bush's watch............There terrorist attack on 9/11 wasnt Clintons fault it happened on Bush's watch and the Current economic crisis isnt Obama's fault since it happened on Bush's watch1
Read what I said again, Mike I said Bush CAN'T blame Clinton and Obama CAN'T blame Bush. I think I'm being consistent here. Presidents ARE judged by what happens during their watch. You just like to argue.
You said it Will its very simple if something happens when YOU are in charge you own it..............Funny how all the bad shit seemed to happen on the incompetent GWB's watch huh............Crusty will probably say they are just a bunch of silly coinkydinks!
The economic implosion HAPPENED during Bush's Presidency you stupid Asshole!
O.K. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch.
Where there any attacks during Clintons terms?
I'm thinking there might have been a couple.
So like according To Willy the village Idiot if a bunch of outlaws rob a bank and masacre a bunch of civillians when Sheriff GWB is Sheriff its magically Sheriff Barack Obama's fault..........a guy who hasnt even been sworn in yet or been put in power..............thats some nifty Reich wing logic there little man!
Mike,you truely are an idiot...when have Will or I defended Bush?
You really should stop banging your head against the wall...its got to be hurting.
Name a COUPLE of Al Qaeda attacks on American soil when Clinton was President?
So Like If I accept a job and the guy there before me loots the place and runs the company into the ground I guess i'm responsible according to Willy AKA Mr Mensa!
Does the first Trade Center bombings count?
Mike,your stupidity gives me a headache.
Its plain to see why you have'nt had a date with a woman for years.
Who was president when the Cole was attacked?
thereturnofRusty said...
Mike,you truely are an idiot...when have Will or I defended Bush?"
Will said "Bush can't blame Clinton and Obama can't blame Bush."
Rusty said "Where there any attacks during Clintons terms?
I'm thinking there might have been a couple."
So one clown says we CANT blame Bush for the current recession even though it HAPPENED DURING Bush's Presidency and the OTHER Fool tries to defend Bush by claiming there were terrorist attacks during Clinton's Presidency too.
But you bastions of truth and honesty ARENT DEFENDING GWB no sirree!
Mike said...
Name a COUPLE of Al Qaeda attacks on American soil when Clinton was President?"
thereturnofRusty replied...
Who was president when the Cole was attacked?"
Another ignorant little troll lie...........I clearly said on American soil and Crusty throws the USS Cole out there was it on American soil.........was it a a ship in your sandbox little troll?
I wonder if no american response from the first Trade Center bombing could have possibly emboldened Al Qaeda leading to the Cole attack.
A Navy ship at sea is considered american soil dimwit.
All naval and american laws are in effect.
See my thumb? Boy you're dumb.
Mike said..."I clearly said american soil."
You're a fruitbowl.
Mike,one last question for you.
Tell the truth.
I mean the truth.
Have you ever been institutionalized?
And did no american response to the Cole attack lead up to 9-11.
Just wondering.
Wow, whadda ya know...
Hang around for a couple of years and the truth finally comes out.
Barty has posted a reasonable explanation for their supposed "hacker" problem awhile back.
HOWEVER, it seems IF they knew this to be the case, why the continued harassment and malicious slanderous accusations against us?
When supposedly they already knew it wasn't us?
And now Barty wants to play all innocent and knowlegable when he was the ringleader tossing the accusations?
Anybody remember Barty silencing comments from "trolls" because "we" were silencing them?
Bart was the leader in claiming we were "hacking" them.
Talk about rewriting history...
(or is that just trying to have it both ways?)
thereturnofRusty said...
I wonder if no american response from the first Trade Center bombing could have possibly emboldened Al Qaeda leading to the Cole attack."
No American response ........hey Dimwit They cuaght the guy that attacked the WTC When Clinton was President just Like they Caught Tim McVeigh............according to YOU after Tim Mcveigh Bombed Oklahoma City Maybe we should have gone and attacked Venezula or somthing kinda like After Al Qaeda and the Taliban attacked us on 9/11 and we attack Iraq.
At least Clinton actually CAUGHT the guys that attacked us unlike the incompetent GWB who STILL hasnt caught Osama and his cronnies that attacked us on 9/11!
There was hacking going on and there WERE REich Wing trolls involved.............I dont know who "they" is you are refering to But I KNOW there was hacking going on!
Do the regulars here want to start a pool,guessing the date that either Bill or Hillary go rogue on Obama?
I'm saying Jan.21st.
Mike, you are so impossible to reason with. 1)I said that Carter was a decent man, 2) I admitted that Carter wasn't to blame for everything, and 3)I agreed with you that George W. Bush was a bad president. She me ANYWHERE where I said that Bush was a good president.
As for this other thing, Mike, let me try to explain it to you one more time. A president IS, IS, responsible for what happens on his watch. Bush 2 is responsible for what happened between 1/01 and 1/09. Carter is responsible for what happened between 1/77 and 1/81. Am I making myself clear here? Bush is wrong to blame Clinton for what happened on his (Bush's) watch and it will be wrong if Obama blames Bush for what happens on his watch (especially after the first 6-12 months or so). Yes, Obama CAN blame Bush for inheriting a bad situation but not if in fact the situation gets worse. Man, are you an imbecile. I give Voltron and Rusty a lot of credit for putting up with you to the extent that they do. You make me pine for Clif, for Christ's sakes!
FUCK YOU............you clowns wouldnt know the TRUTH if it bit you on your ass!
Mikey,I think Will's caught on to you.
BTW Will.where the hell has Klink been?
Perhaps he's on some secret mission for the government....or perhaps he's up on the Bumf*&k Kentucky water tower.
I suspect Mike has gone off his meds again.
Last week Mike, A.K.A Louis Rukeyser was crowing about putting 60,000 grr in the market,he based this financial move on Obama's announced economic team......smooth move,ExLax.
Will,have you ever checked out the media web site "chickaboomer?"
Its has some interesting stuff on occasion.
I have to admit, Rusty, of the three of them, I like Clif the best. At least he has an excuse to be out of his gorge. Mike, he kind of reminds me of a rotweiler on a leash, who occasionally gets off the leash and starts biting people. Definitely needs to go back ON the meds. Chickaboomer? Is it about chicks, I hope?
So, Mike has close friends who are "repugs"? Gee, I wonder if he compares tham to Hitler, too.
No just the Neo Con asswipes you and your buddies defend!
I don't defend the Neo Cons, Mike. I've been arguing against Bush's pre-emptive actions for 5 years. Wrong again, stooge.
So, Mike, is Chuck Hagel a "repug"? What about Olympia Snow? How 'bout Lincoln Chaffee, Colin Powell, etc.? Why do you persist in using pejorative terms to define entire groups? Does your substandard intellect need to do such things in order to make sense of a complex world? You are absolutely pathetic.
Post a Comment